Prepare for the University of Central Florida GEB4522 Data Driven Decision Making Exam 2. Utilize interactive quizzes, flashcards, and detailed explanations to excel in your test. Enhance your decision-making skills and ace the exam!

The correct answer is that correlation can suggest causation but does not imply it. This distinction is crucial in data-driven decision-making because it emphasizes the limitations of correlation analysis. When two variables show a correlation, it indicates that there is a relationship between them—meaning they tend to change together in some way. However, correlation alone does not prove that one variable causes the changes in the other.

Establishing causation requires more rigorous analysis, often involving controlled experimentation or additional evidence that rules out other explanations. For example, while a strong correlation between ice cream sales and drowning incidents can be observed during summer months, it would be misleading to conclude that ice cream sales cause drowning. Instead, both are influenced by a third variable: the warm weather that encourages swimming and consuming ice cream.

This understanding reinforces the need for careful interpretation of data and helps avoid erroneous conclusions in research and decision-making processes. Thus, while correlation can be a useful starting point for exploring potential relationships, it is important to investigate further before inferring causation.