Which of the following best describes a difference between a feasibility report and an internal proposal?

The distinction between a feasibility report and an internal proposal is fundamentally tied to the stakes involved and the purpose of each document. A feasibility report is often created to assess the viability of a project or idea before significant resources are committed; the author’s aim is to provide an objective analysis that can help decision-makers consider various factors such as costs, benefits, risks, and alternatives. Therefore, the author typically has less personal investment in the project’s outcomes compared to someone writing an internal proposal, who usually has a vested interest in gaining approval for their specific project or initiative. The internal proposal is often presented to stakeholders who are directly connected to the proposer’s goals, which increases the personal stakes involved.

This understanding highlights the nature of the authorship and accountability in different contexts, underscoring the detached analytical perspective of feasibility reports versus the advocacy-driven nature of internal proposals. This makes the distinction regarding the stakes involved particularly pertinent in evaluating the differences between these two types of documents.