Which of these is most likely a difference between a feasibility report and an internal proposal?

The distinction that stands out between a feasibility report and an internal proposal lies in the level of personal investment and stake involved for the authors. In general, the author of an internal proposal is often proposing a specific course of action that directly impacts their department or organization. They have a vested interest in the success of their proposal since it typically aligns with their goals and objectives, whether for resource allocation, project approval, or another benefit.

Conversely, a feasibility report is usually more objective and analytical in nature, assessing the viability of a project or initiative without the same level of personal interest from the authors. It focuses on data analysis, potential risks, benefits, and the overall practicality of the proposed venture, often prepared by individuals or teams who may not be stakeholders in the project's outcome.

This understanding highlights why the author's stake is indeed a significant differentiating factor. The internal proposal is personal and aligned with specific organizational agendas, whereas the feasibility report is more of an analytical tool meant to evaluate situations impartially.